[isleaiw1]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 02 July 2024 - 10:26 AM, said:

A simple question requiring a simple answer.

Yet here we go again.

Whataboutery ignoring official government numbers or ones from the Goldman Sachs previously employing Sunak, and your very own words.

Not to mention playing the Mail-esque media's game of twisting and turning Starmer's family values into some sort of dereliction.

The same characters who repeatedly patted Boris the Liar on the back.

But hey, after your desperation to smear Angie Raynor for summat she didn't do...

I will admit to being intrigued that you only picked items that suited your agenda, should have just thrown a load of stuff in there for the comparison, would have been more fun.

I have never praised Boris (I'll not use childish names) on the back, in fact my consistent comments is he has been sacked from every job possible and shouldnt have been near the PM job....

As for SKS, I admire his desire but I think it is naive and simple to think he can do it and still do the job properly.

I never read that Angie had found a way to have two PPRs... I suspect she found a way to fill in her CGT form a few years late to show no tax payable. Otherwise she would be publishing her tax advice so that we can all have 2 PPRs (and I did apologise... something in short supply on here from those best at dishing out insults)

[Wooden Spoon]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 02 July 2024 - 07:39 AM, said:

No, sorry, no whataboutery, just a straightforward answer to a straightforward question, please...

It?s not a straight forward question though it?s a loaded one that has not accounted for all economic influences.

Damn predictive text
Just say immigrants are not the biggest economic factor

This post has been edited by Wooden Spoon: Today, 12:30 PM

[Search & Destroy]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 02 July 2024 - 05:59 AM, said:

'Bob's Board' quiz time.

Place the following in order of impact on the UK economy:

Brexit.

Liz Truss's 'Kwar Crash' budget.

Asylum seekers...

Asylum Seekers third I imagine

Are you suggesting it doesn?t matter how many come or how much they cost the taxpayer because it?s less than the others on the list?

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

 Wooden Spoon, on 02 July 2024 - 11:53 AM, said:

It?s not a straight forward question though it?s a loaded one that has not accounted for all economic influences.

Damn predictive text
Just say immigrants are not the biggest economic factor

It's both.

Demonstrating the absurd dishonesty of those who applauded Brexit and Truss loudest - Farage and the Mail-esque media - now blaming asylum seekers for financial constraints.

You, I and every informed person knows what that's about.

And where it leads...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: Today, 01:14 PM

[Spire-ite]

isleaiw1, on 02 July 2024 - 06:12 AM, said:

Can we add Blair's PFI deals, Blairs "make benefits pay" approach...?

And soon to add the Labour tax hikes and tax and spend policies...?

Asylum seekers will be needed soon to add workers to a nation that have too many old people costing money, too many economically inactive people costing money, and too few workers paying money in...

Happy days.

Top Trump is Gordon Browns HS2....

[s42blue]

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGesUNpx3/