Juan Ugarte
#1 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:54 AM
Anyone heard anything?
Signing him, alongside Paul Hall would definately give us more goals but what about the strikers we already have? Should we lose one to let this guy in or just add him to the squad?
#2
Posted 09 June 2005 - 08:58 AM
Mark Jones, on Jun 9 2005, 09:54 AM, said:
Anyone heard anything?
Signing him, alongside Paul Hall would definately give us more goals but what about the strikers we already have? Should we lose one to let this guy in or just add him to the squad?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This really would put a tin lid on this week wouldn't it? I wouldn't be able to smile wide enough. He made mince-meat of us and plenty of other teams in this league and I would be delighted to have him to say the least.
Still, I'll believe it when I see it! Lets not get carried away, rumours are great fun at this time of year but they are just that! Having said that, a few folk would be tucking in to a very large slice of humble pie if Roy pulled this one off.
#3 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:01 AM
#4 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:04 AM
So will we be happy with 3 quality players or would any of us want 5 not so good quality players?
Personally I will settle for 3 quality players.
#5 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:12 AM
Mark Jones, on Jun 9 2005, 10:04 AM, said:
So will we be happy with 3 quality players or would any of us want 5 not so good quality players?
Personally I will settle for 3 quality players.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well we signed the wide player already,one has to be a goalie and the other in midfield,i would settle for that and give the players we have a chance.
#6
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:15 AM
#7
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:16 AM
#8 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:22 AM
sixmilliondollardan, on Jun 9 2005, 10:15 AM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thats where the 3 newly signed youngsters come in. Use them as a temporary measure.
We cant afford to build a big squad of quality players. the sums won't add up I'm afraid.
#9
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:25 AM
#10
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:36 AM
Mark Jones, on Jun 9 2005, 09:22 AM, said:
We cant afford to build a big squad of quality players. the sums won't add up I'm afraid.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
True but I think we can, and need to, sign a few more players- Hudson, McMaster, Evatt, Innes have all gone and, so far, only one player has come into replace them. If we don't sign some defensive cover two injuries at left and centre backs could leave us in serious trouble and we also look thin in midfield even if we sign another central player. Up front is the one place we do seem to have enough in terms of number, if not always quality.
It would seem unwise for us to have to rely on the younger players coming into the team as it usually takes at least a season for them to bed in/find out if they have what it takes. An example is Smith who whilst obviously talented still has a lot to learn and isn't yet someone you can guarantee consistent performances from.
#11
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:38 AM
sixmilliondollardan, on Jun 9 2005, 09:36 AM, said:
It would seem unwise for us to have to rely on the younger players coming into the team as it usually takes at least a season for them to bed in/find out if they have what it takes. An example is Smith who whilst obviously talented still has a lot to learn and isn't yet someone you can guarantee consistent performances from.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
its actually:-
Hudson
Evatt
Innes
Dawson
Richmond
McMaster
Logan
all not being paid
#12 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:44 AM
Spired, on Jun 9 2005, 10:38 AM, said:
Hudson
Evatt
Innes
Dawson
Richmond
McMaster
Logan
all not being paid
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Didnt McMaster come in after Innes had left? Therefore I would assume we were not paying them both at the same time. Same goes for Richmond
#13
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:49 AM
Mark Jones, on Jun 9 2005, 10:44 AM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Out of the players listed there i expect we are still paying Hudson hes still contracted to us until the end of the month.
72+ points Play off's
83+ points Party Time
#14
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:51 AM
Mark Jones, on Jun 9 2005, 10:04 AM, said:
So will we be happy with 3 quality players or would any of us want 5 not so good quality players?
Personally I will settle for 3 quality players.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think with Evatts departure most would expect 4 quality players in
72+ points Play off's
83+ points Party Time
#15 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:52 AM
Webster, on Jun 9 2005, 10:49 AM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would hope we aren't still paying him he quit.
#16 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 09:55 AM
Webster, on Jun 9 2005, 10:51 AM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Four would be nice but I was taking into account Evvos fee when I said three quality players. If it can be stretched to four, I will be amazed.
#18
Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:03 AM
#19 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:06 AM
Meden Blue, on Jun 9 2005, 11:03 AM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah i noticed they are old stories,i suppose we will have to wait and see,here's another link
http://skysports.planetfootball.com/list.a...l=Football_Home
#20
Posted 09 June 2005 - 12:09 PM