[Tylerdurdencfc]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 05:25 PM, said:

A narcissistic buffoon kicked out of office because his own party got sick of lying on his behalf, handed the longest ever Parliamentary suspension for lying to the House, who ran as fast as his chubby little legs could carry him rather than account to his constituents and in large part the architect of the Tories' imminent extinction, writing in a paper that's become a parody of itself for deranged anti Labour propaganda.

GeeBeebies is a better barometer of who to vote for by comparison...

A good bit of body shaming there when there is no need for it. Doesn't show you in a good light

This post has been edited by Tylerdurdencfc: 29 June 2024 - 08:57 PM

[Mr Mercury]

Tylerdurdencfc, on 29 June 2024 - 08:56 PM, said:

A good bit of body shaming there when there is no need for it. Doesn't show you in a good light

Our friend wears a very different mask with regard to posting about pro or anti Labour things, and the mask often slips. I look forward to the explanation.
Join the club who?ve got this section of the forum sussed.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 June 2024 - 09:05 PM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Our friend Sir Elton gets it right...

https://www.lbc.co.u...s-labour-party/

As did this former arch tory...

https://www.independ...s-b2428395.html

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 09:10 PM, said:

Our friend Sir Elton gets it right...

https://www.lbc.co.u...s-labour-party/

As did this former arch tory...

https://www.independ...s-b2428395.html

Another multi multi millionaire telling the working classes how it should be.
And a former Daily Mail columnist….
You will really encompass anyone and everyone who once you despised to promote your view. I hope none of them had chubby legs, mind you they’re for Labour now so that’s ok.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 June 2024 - 09:25 PM

[Tylerdurdencfc]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 09:10 PM, said:

Our friend Sir Elton gets it right...

https://www.lbc.co.u...s-labour-party/

As did this former arch tory...

https://www.independ...s-b2428395.html

Are you going to admit that either you take delight in bodyshaming people (tories) when there is not need as part of your argument or will you admit you were wrong for doing it and apologise to the board?

This post has been edited by Tylerdurdencfc: 29 June 2024 - 09:28 PM

[isleaiw1]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 09:10 PM, said:

Our friend Sir Elton gets it right...

https://www.lbc.co.u...s-labour-party/

As did this former arch tory...

https://www.independ...s-b2428395.html

Another tax exile telling people how to vote when it wont affect him... and I didnt read past the headline on the second one, but it sounds like ABC again...

Has SKS actually said what we are voting for yet beyond a few wishes and no real idea how they will be paid for - I love how Rachel Reeves is saying in the Telegraph that she wants the UK to be a place of stability in the world when the rest is going to rat sh1t, but we dont as yet know how any of these things are being paid for because every informed expert says Labour's numbers dont stack up (and nor do the Tories). So apparently the French are likely to elect an extreme govt who will increase debt and spend - and Labour are claiming to be the stability against that, so there must be more money being raised.... but where from?

Guess we will find out in the next 12 to 24 months - shall we circle back and hear the excuses later..?

Might do an Crashley and say lets see how is it going in 12 months - but as already said the improving economic climate will see them through that, its 24 to 36 months when the pain will kick in...

Oh, and a legal challenge to VAT on private schools, could that be Labour's Rwanda moment in the first few months... at least it will save the state schools for a bit longer....

[Mr Mercury]

Tylerdurdencfc, on 29 June 2024 - 09:23 PM, said:

Are you going to admit that either you take delight in bodyshaming people when there is not need as part of your argument or will you admit you were wrong for doing it and apologise to the board?

Our friend recently told a blatant lie about me saying ?I repeatedly refused to condemn the July 6 riots in the US?.when I pointed this out and asked for proof he changed the point to?.show me evidence where you condemned the July 6 riots..
Sorry but i can?t take his posts seriously. Like I say..I?ve got this part of the forum well sussed.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

 Mr Mercury, on 29 June 2024 - 09:19 PM, said:

Another multi multi millionaire telling the working classes how it should be.

I owe you an apology, I really do.

I quite clearly forgot your talent for self mocking satire, as so hilariously demonstrated here.

I mean, a post like this after yet another day endorsing Farage and Johnson?

Sorry, I should've remembered how you eshewed the stage of serious debate a long, long time ago...

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 09:32 PM, said:

I owe you an apology, I really do.

I quite clearly forgot your talent for self mocking satire, as so hilariously demonstrated here.

I mean, a post like this after yet another day endorsing Farage and Johnson?

Sorry, I should've remembered how you eshewed the stage of serious debate a long, long time ago...

You long ago lost the moral high ground for serious debate?
Your own words the other day to isleaw..you?ve joined the list of those with whom reasonable debate is no longer possible…that?s to someone who offers far more of a counter point than I ever do, but joined the list of those you can?t debate with simply because he disagrees.
It?s getting to the point we?re if those on that list don?t post you?d be replying to yourself.
Mind you that?s probably utopia to you

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 June 2024 - 09:45 PM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

 Tylerdurdencfc, on 29 June 2024 - 09:23 PM, said:

Are you going to admit that either you take delight in bodyshaming people (tories) when there is not need as part of your argument or will you admit you were wrong for doing it and apologise to the board?

Really?

Seriously?

A forum peppered with countless examples of bigotry and prejudice and unnecessary namecalling yet you're suddenly demanding an apology for dubbing probably the most corrupt politician of modern times "chubby"?

A post rendered even more absurd by folk previously using terms like "woak" and "cancelled" to defend the likes of, erm, 'Chubby Brown' agreeing with it.

If you genuinely are concerned by weight issues, let's have a debate about which parties are more likely to bow down to the multi-billion pound junk food lobby and which aren't...

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 10:00 PM, said:

Really?

Seriously?

A forum peppered with countless examples of bigotry and prejudice and unnecessary namecalling yet you're suddenly demanding an apology for dubbing probably the most corrupt politician of modern times "chubby"?

A post rendered even more absurd by folk previously using terms like "woak" and "cancelled" to defend the likes of, erm, 'Chubby Brown' agreeing with it.

If you genuinely are concerned by weight issues, let's have a debate about which parties are more likely to bow down to the multi-billion pound junk food lobby and which aren't...

That?s a No then. But when I called you out for calling Boris Bozo and a clown you stated that was ok because that was an image he?d cultivated, so calling Chubby Brown chubby should be ok because that?s his image. And calling people out for ..Unnecessary name calling…you really typed that! No sense of irony at all have you..
So will you apologies for body shaming or is it funny and ok because it against a Tory?

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 June 2024 - 10:11 PM

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 09:32 PM, said:

I owe you an apology, I really do.

I quite clearly forgot your talent for self mocking satire, as so hilariously demonstrated here.

I mean, a post like this after yet another day endorsing Farage and Johnson?

Sorry, I should've remembered how you eshewed the stage of serious debate a long, long time ago...

Loving the squirming tonight, so if it?s a multi multi millionaire supporting the Tories he?s a pretty bad egg, if he?s supporting Labour he?s seen the light.
I admire your pugnacious attitude tonight, I myself have been in this position many times before , but maybe best to stop digging.

[isleaiw1]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 June 2024 - 10:00 PM, said:

Really?

Seriously?

A forum peppered with countless examples of bigotry and prejudice and unnecessary namecalling yet you're suddenly demanding an apology for dubbing probably the most corrupt politician of modern times "chubby"?

A post rendered even more absurd by folk previously using terms like "woak" and "cancelled" to defend the likes of, erm, 'Chubby Brown' agreeing with it.

If you genuinely are concerned by weight issues, let's have a debate about which parties are more likely to bow down to the multi-billion pound junk food lobby and which aren't...

Well given you are so up on being politically correct, you will understand that weightism is a thing... besides, how often do you run these days? Maybe Boris' legs are fitter than yours...? Putting it slightly more seriously, with eating disorders rife, and social media showing images that are known to be doctored to look better than reality, its a major issue to youngsters today. Guess none of your kids have had annorexia... or grandkids, it can start early these days.

Yep, fat bastard here but I walk a lot so my legs are my best bit. Maybe its the same for Boris, not much to be beat for him to be fair...

[Mr Mercury]

isleaiw1, on 29 June 2024 - 10:30 PM, said:

Well given you are so up on being politically correct, you will understand that weightism is a thing... besides, how often do you run these days? Maybe Boris' legs are fitter than yours...? Putting it slightly more seriously, with eating disorders rife, and social media showing images that are known to be doctored to look better than reality, its a major issue to youngsters today. Guess none of your kids have had annorexia... or grandkids, it can start early these days.

Yep, fat bastard here but I walk a lot so my legs are my best bit. Maybe its the same for Boris, not much to be beat for him to be fair...

This could be our friends Farage moment?.not calling out Putin
This could be our friends Anderson moment ?.calling out Khan
This could be our friends Boris moment?partying with a glass of wine.
Anyhow the mask has well and truly slipped?a fat shaming moment!

[Mr Mercury]

I recieved an email from the Conservative Party yesterday warning of the dangers of electing Starmer. It contained a few bullet points regarding what they think Starmer will do. I?ll post it here so we can judge over the next Parliament whether it?s a valid warning or not.

Attached File(s)

•  IMG_5496.jpeg (409.2K)
  Number of downloads: 7

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: Yesterday, 06:27 AM

[Tylerdurdencfc]

Labour Party member in vile online attack on ex Prime Minister!

A hardline Larbour Party member and long time Labour campaigner was yesterday exposed on an online forum for body shaming ex Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The unnecessary comment caused outrage amongst other social media users with many criticising the comment and condoning the personal attack on Mr Johnson.

For those people that are unfamiliar with body shaming, it is when an individual refers to another's body features, usually when the other individual is overweight or underweight. It is a form of bullying. Recently, body shaming has seen a significant rise through online trolling and can lead to serious issues such as emotional and mental health problems. In some cases severe anorexia.

The Labour Party member when questioned by other social media users, refused to apologise for his actions, instead trying to justify his comments with comparisons to other comments from other social media uses.

With the recent increase of abusive comments in the run up to this election, it is hope that all abuse is eliminated from campaigns.

So far Sir Keir Starmer has yet to comment on the incident, but with his hard line stance towards Party members, we will have to wait and see if the individual is removed from the Party membership or voluntarily exits the Larbour Party.

This post has been edited by Tylerdurdencfc: Yesterday, 06:51 AM

[Goku]

 Mr Mercury, on 29 June 2024 - 08:19 PM, said:

Good point re the older Labour voters, I know a few dyed in the wool Labour voters who make it quite clear that immigration and stopping the boats is a major problem, a view that Goku and others of the hard left would find extremely bigoted. In fact I?m sure if they went round the former, probably soon to be returned, red wall seats and listened to Labour voters in the Brexit supporting areas they?d view them as nothing more than bigots, but then again they just be parroting the view of Gordon Brown, and of course they?ll ignore the fact because they don?t want to admit the hard left is a major player in bigoted views. But like I say.. there?s no bigger bigot than a left wing bigot.

You assume incorrectly, as usual. There are absolutely legitimate concerns over immigration to this country, and stopping the boats (hate the phrase) would certainly be a good thing - it would deprive criminals of income, it would stop people dying in the sea etc part of the problem is that the UK doesn?t have a legit legal way of getting into this country outside of a very small very specific couple of methods which I?ve gone over in the past and cba to do so again, we?re also very slow to process claims which is a political decision by the current Government. Obviously this is exacerbated by us being a stone?s throw from France, making this a very difficult situation all round.

There are plenty of bigots who hate foreigners for X and Y, who genuinely want to see corpses floating in the English Channel; that?s very different to somebody having legitimate concerns over the amount of uncontrolled immigration we?re currently seeing. So no, I don?t think that concerns over immigration/stopping the boats is inherently bigoted. I?ll await your apology.

This post has been edited by Goku: Yesterday, 07:21 AM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

 Tylerdurdencfc, on 30 June 2024 - 06:49 AM, said:

Labour Party member in vile online attack on ex Prime Minister!

A hardline Larbour Party member and long time Labour campaigner was yesterday exposed on an online forum for body shaming ex Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The unnecessary comment caused outrage amongst other social media users with many criticising the comment and condoning the personal attack on Mr Johnson.

For those people that are unfamiliar with body shaming, it is when an individual refers to another's body features, usually when the other individual is overweight or underweight. It is a form of bullying. Recently, body shaming has seen a significant rise through online trolling and can lead to serious issues such as emotional and mental health problems. In some cases severe anorexia.

The Labour Party member when questioned by other social media users, refused to apologise for his actions, instead trying to justify his comments with comparisons to other comments from other social media uses.

With the recent increase of abusive comments in the run up to this election, it is hope that all abuse is eliminated from campaigns.

So far Sir Keir Starmer has yet to comment on the incident, but with his hard line stance towards Party members, we will have to wait and see if the individual is removed from the Party membership or voluntarily exits the Larbour Party.

You read The Mail...right?

[Mr Mercury]

Goku, on 30 June 2024 - 07:17 AM, said:

You assume incorrectly, as usual. There are absolutely legitimate concerns over immigration to this country, and stopping the boats (hate the phrase) would certainly be a good thing - it would deprive criminals of income, it would stop people dying in the sea etc part of the problem is that the UK doesn?t have a legit legal way of getting into this country outside of a very small very specific couple of methods which I?ve gone over in the past and cba to do so again, we?re also very slow to process claims which is a political decision by the current Government. Obviously this is exacerbated by us being a stone?s throw from France, making this a very difficult situation all round.

There are plenty of bigots who hate foreigners for X and Y, who genuinely want to see corpses floating in the English Channel; that?s very different to somebody having legitimate concerns over the amount of uncontrolled immigration we?re currently seeing. So no, I don?t think that concerns over immigration/stopping the boats is inherently bigoted. I?ll await your apology.

Of course mate no probs. Apologies for an incorrect assumption.

[Tylerdurdencfc]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 30 June 2024 - 07:21 AM, said:

You read The Mail...right?

Is this your shortest ever response to something? Lost for words maybe or just you've no argument whatsoever so resort your to usual comparisons.

I think you've been exposed as the hypocrite that you are.

Condemn other parties members for what they do and say. But think your actions are appropriate because the person you made comments about is a Tory.