The Earl of Chesterfield, on 22 May 2024 - 06:37 PM, said:
From the bloke who won't vote Labour 'cos he thinks some hard left takeover could, possibly, just maybe happen at some unspecified point in the future. Despite our friend 'Turrhall' saying similar because of a supposed right wing takeover.
For what it's worth the suggestions of why Sunak's called an early election in my initial response were from seasoned commentators in the mainstream media.
However it speaks volumes that your opening and subsequent posts focus almost entirely on taunting Labour whilst barely even mentioning the tories' record.
But hey, at least you didn't go ga-ga over Angie Raynor and things that 'haven't and might never happen' in terms of her former home again...
And there you go again, putting words in my mouth that I have never said. I have said have never, and probably never will, vote Tory. I've said I voted LD last time as I preferred their manifesto and I worry that the Unions and the left will spoil Labour plans. I have never said I wont vote Labour.
Of course I am taunting Labour, where would the sport be in taunting the Tories on here.
As for Rayner, has she been found innocent yet? Declared her tax advice? But you assume she is innocent when you would assume a Tory was guilty. I could never bow to the alter of the rosette and subvert my thoughts and opinions to theirs, but good for you...
(I did mention gold plated pensions though - thought you'd comment on that! Another perk to the public sector, they can wait to see who wins and then f off to live elsewhere if they dont like who wins or the new roles, knowing their pension is secure!)